The Collapse of the Family Tree
The so-called "evolutionary
tree" made by evolutionist biologist Ernst
Haeckel at the close of the 19th century. |
The scenario of "man's
family tree" is refuted by fossil evidence.
It is understood today that species which are
presented as ancestors of one another are actually
different races that lived at the same period.
The scenario of "human
evolution" is a totally fiction. In order
for such a family tree to exist, a gradual evolution
from ape to man should have taken place and the
fossil record of this process should have been
found. However, there is a huge gap between apes
and humans. Skeletal structures, cranial capacities,
and other such criteria as walking upright or
bent sharply forward are what distinguish humans
from apes.

THE FAMILY TREE ONLY
EXISTS ONLY IN DRAWINGS
The schemes of"the
family tree of man", products of the
wide imaginative power of evolutionists,
are disproved by the fossil record.
|
Another significant finding
proving that there can be no family tree among
these different species is that the species that
are presented as ancestors of each other in fact
lived concurrently. If, as the evolutionists claim,
australopithecines converted to Homo habilis and
if they, in turn, converted to Homo erectus, the
eras they lived in should necessarily have followed
each other. However, there is no such chronological
order.
The evolutionist paleontologist
Alan Walker confirms this fact by stating that
"there is evidence from East Africa for late-surviving
small Australopithecus individuals that were contemporaneous
first with H. Habilis, then with H. erectus."56
Louis Leakey has found fossils of Australopithecus,
Homo habilis and Homo erectus almost next to each
other in Olduvai Gorge region, Bed II layer.57
GOULD
CONFESSES
Although he is an evolutionist himself,
Harvard University Palaeontologist Stephen
Jay Gould admits that the scenario of
the "human's family tree" has collapsed.
|
A paleontologist from Harvard
University, Stephen Jay Gould, explains this deadlock
of evolution although he is an evolutionist himself:
The
family tree concept that stretches from
the primates to apes, and then over to man,
exists only in the dreams of evolutionists. |
"What has become of our
ladder if there are three coexisting lineages
of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines,
and H. habilis), none clearly derived from another?
Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary
trends during their tenure on earth."58
When we move on from Homo erectus
to Homo sapiens, we again see that there is no
family tree to talk about. There is evidence showing
that Homo erectus and archaic Homo sapiens continued
living up to 27,000 years and even 10,000 years
before our time. In the Kow swamp in Australia,
some 13,000-year-old Homo erectus skulls have
been found. On Java Island, a Homo erectus skull
was found that was 27,000 years old.59
These finds indicate that the
creatures presented as the "ancestors of
man" by the theory of evolution are either
extinct species that have nothing to do with one
another or lost human races. |